Elsevier

Journal of Electrocardiology

Volume 48, Issue 4, July–August 2015, Pages 586-592
Journal of Electrocardiology

The synthesized vectorcardiogram resembles the measured vectorcardiogram in patients with dyssynchronous heart failure

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2015.04.001Get rights and content

Highlights

  • The vectorcardiogram (VCG) has regained interest in electrical dyssynchrony patients.

  • The VCG can be recorded or synthesized from the 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG).

  • The synthesized VCG shows large resemblances with the recorded VCG.

  • This enables retrospective and prospective VCG analysis of previously recorded ECGs in CRT studies.

Abstract

Background

The use of vectorcardiography (VCG) has regained interest, however, original Frank-VCG equipment is rare. This study compares the measured VCGs with those synthesized from the 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) in patients with heart failure and conduction abnormalities, who are candidate for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT).

Methods

In 92 CRT candidates, Frank-VCG and 12-lead ECG were recorded before CRT implantation. The ECG was converted to a VCG using the Kors method (Kors-VCG) and the two methods were compared using correlation and Bland–Altman analyses.

Results

Variables calculated from the Frank- and Kors-VCG showed correlation coefficients between 0.77 and 0.90. There was a significant but small underestimation by the Kors-VCG method, relative bias ranging from − 1.9% ± 4.6% (QRS-T angle) to − 9.4% ± 20.8% (T area).

Conclusion

The present study shows that it is justified to use Kors-VCG calculations for VCG analysis, which enables retrospective VCG analysis of previously recorded ECGs in studies related to CRT.

Introduction

With the use of vectorcardiography (VCG), the size and direction of the electrical forces generated by the heart are recorded and displayed in three dimensions. The VCG consists of three orthonormal leads X, Y, and Z, containing phase information between these leads. This technique was first described 101 years ago by Williams [1]. The VCG technique was almost abandoned and the 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) became the clinical standard, because of the need for special VCG recording equipment, the lack of a standard VCG-lead system [2], [3], [4], the impracticality of a back electrode in many of these systems, and the complexity to interpret the different loop morphologies for diagnosis [5], [6]. The interest in the diagnostic value of the VCG has, however, never completely subsided and with today's computer technology the vector loops can be synthesized from the 12-lead ECG resulting in a revival of the VCG.

Several systems of three orthonormal leads have been described for recording the VCG, though the most commonly used one is the 8-electrode system according to Frank [4]. Due to limited availability of Frank-VCG recording systems, the VCG is commonly synthesized from the 12-lead ECG. This is achieved by multiplying 8 independent ECG leads (two limb leads and all six precordial leads) by a matrix. Recent studies demonstrated that the Kors-derived VCG results in the best approximation of the Frank-VCG [5], [7], [8], [9].

The matrix proposed by Kors et al. is based on a learning set from the Common Standards for Electrocardiography (CSE) multilead library, including both patients and healthy individuals, and was generated by multiple linear regression [8]. Although the Kors-VCG nicely resembles the Frank-VCG in previous studies [5], [7], [8], [9], a comparison has never been made for patients with heart failure and a left ventricular (LV) conduction delay, mostly due to left bundle branch block (LBBB). These patients are commonly treated with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). CRT has been shown to improve cardiac pump function, heart failure symptoms, quality of life, and survival [10]. Although the effects of CRT in large clinical trials are impressive on a group level, the benefits in individuals vary considerably; the non-response rate to this therapy is still 30–50% [11]. To reduce the risk of complications and the unnecessary use of expensive products, patient selection should be improved. Recent studies have shown that the VCG could play an important role in the selection of patients for CRT [12], [13] or in the optimization of the CRT settings [14]. Therefore, the current study aims to compare the Frank-VCG and the Kors-VCG in patients with heart failure and LV conduction delay focusing on vectorcardiographic variables relevant to resynchronization of the ventricles.

Section snippets

Patient population

The patient population used in this study has been described previously [13]. It consisted of 138 consecutive patients with heart failure, who were scheduled for implantation of a CRT device at the Maastricht University Hospital between September 2010 and June 2012. Excluded were patients with an intrinsic QRS duration < 120 ms (n = 13) or previous RV pacing during either the VCG (n = 22) or ECG recording (n = 2). Another 9 patients were excluded due to technical disturbances, multiple ectopic beats or

Patient characteristics

The baseline characteristics of the 92 patients are shown in Table 1. Most patients were male, had NYHA class II or III and LBBB according to the Strauss [17] criteria. In addition, half of the patients had ischemic heart failure etiology and a quarter had atrial fibrillation (AF). Furthermore, the patients had a reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). These characteristics are typical for patients receiving CRT [18].

Frank-VCG versus Kors-VCG

Examples of the Frank-VCG and Kors-VCG are presented in Fig. 1.

Discussion

This study shows a good resemblance between the recorded Frank-VCG and the Kors-VCG in patients with left ventricular conduction abnormalities. Also variables calculated from the Frank-VCG and the Kors-VCG method showed good correspondence.

Conclusions

In patients with heart failure and LV conduction delay who are candidate for CRT, the Frank-VCG and the Kors-VCG show good resemblance. Furthermore, the Kors-VCG method avoids the need for special recording equipment, while the extra information from the VCG is still obtained. The Kors-VCG enables retrospective as well as prospective VCG analysis of routinely recorded 12-lead ECGs in studies related to CRT.

Disclosures

The customized software was developed in collaboration with Ortivus AB, Danderyd, Sweden and the recording equipment was a loan from the same source. F.W.P. has received research grants from Medtronic, Biological Delivery Systems (Johnson&Johnson), EBR Systems, MSD, and Proteus Biomedical and is advisor to St. Jude Medical. K.V. consults for Medtronic and received speaker's fees of St. Jude Medical. E.B.E, S.A., C.J.M.v.D, and L.W. have nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgments

This research was performed within the framework of CTMM (Center for Translational Molecular Medicine; www.ctmm.nl), Project COHFAR (Congestive Heart Failure and Arrhythmia; Grant 01C-203), and supported by the Dutch Heart Foundation.

References (21)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (18)

  • Strategies to Improve Selection of Patients Without Typical Left Bundle Branch Block for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

    2020, JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
    Citation Excerpt :

    QRS area could possibly also be of use in a subgroup of patients with non-LBBB. VCG can be derived from commercially available ECG machines, allowing markers such as QRS area to be provided without additional recordings or leads (53). The advantage of QRS area is that it is an observer-independent parameter, whereas the definition for LBBB is operator-dependent.

  • Vectorcardiographic QRS area is associated with long-term outcome after cardiac resynchronization therapy

    2019, Heart Rhythm
    Citation Excerpt :

    It is possible that the use of transformed 12-lead ECGs rather than vectorcardiograms may have led to patient misclassification. However, a prior study has shown good agreement between these methods,17 and furthermore, 12-lead ECGs (and not vectorcardiograms) are ubiquitous in clinical practice. Because of the relatively small study cohort, we were unable to separately test and validate the QRS area threshold in separate subpopulations.

  • The relation between local repolarization and T-wave morphology in heart failure patients

    2017, International Journal of Cardiology
    Citation Excerpt :

    Beside conventional measurement of QRS duration and QT-time, also variables were calculated that were derived from the vectorcardiogram, calculated from the digital 12-lead ECGs as described in detail elsewhere. Calculated were three dimensional QRSarea and Tarea, as descriptors of the size of these two ECG components [7,15]. In addition, the spatial angle between the mean direction of the QRS complex and T-wave (spatial QRS-T angle) was calculated.

  • Vectorcardiographic QRS area identifies delayed left ventricular lateral wall activation determined by electroanatomic mapping in candidates for cardiac resynchronization therapy

    2016, Heart Rhythm
    Citation Excerpt :

    We used an adapted version of the Kors method to calculate VCGs from standard 12-lead ECGs, which is an estimation of the gold standard Frank VCG. However, previous studies demonstrated that the Kors method shows the best resemblance to the Frank VCG,24 and the method recently has also been validated for use in CRT patients.25 Coronary venous EAM can be used at the time of CRT implantation to determine the presence of delayed LVLW activation, an electrical substrate amenable to resynchronization therapy.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text