Journal of Electrocardiology
Volume 43, Issue 5 , Pages 390-395, September 2010

Short QT interval in clinical practice

  • Preben Bjerregaard, MD, DMSc

      Affiliations

    • Division of Cardiology, VA Medical Center and Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Division of Cardiology, VA Medical Center and Washington University in St. Louis, 915 North Grand, St. Louis, MO 63106, USA.
  • ,
  • Hari Nallapaneni, MD

      Affiliations

    • Internal Medicine, St. Louis University Hospital, St. Louis, MO, USA
  • ,
  • Ihor Gussak, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • NewCardio, Inc. Princeton, NJ, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Bridgewater, NJ, USA

Received 3 May 2010 published online 05 August 2010.

Abstract 

The last ten years have seen a growing interest in clinical scenarios, where a short QT interval may play a role, especially because of an increased risk of sudden cardiac death in some situations. One such entity is Short QT Syndrome, which has emerged as a rare, but very malignant disease, in particular when the QT interval is very short. A short QT interval has also been noticed in some patients with other arrhythmic syndromes such as Idiopathic Ventricular Fibrillation, Brugade Syndrome and Early Repolarization Syndrome, but the role of a short QT interval in these settings is so far not known. Hypercalcemia often leads to shortening of the QT interval, but there are no data in humans to suggest an increased risk of sudden cardiac death in this setting. In addition, a shorter-than-usual QT interval has been reported in patients with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and in response to atropine, catecholamine and Hyperthermia.

When a short QT interval is encountered in daily clinical practice, these various scenarios needs to be considered, but it is still not possible to come up with clear guidelines for how to work up and risk stratify such individuals. Genetic testing is only useful in very few and the value of an electrophysiologic study, Holter monitoring or stress testing to assess QT adaptation to heart rate and T wave morphology analysis may all be helpful, but not well-established, tests in this setting.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0022-0736(10)00262-1

doi:10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2010.06.004

Journal of Electrocardiology
Volume 43, Issue 5 , Pages 390-395, September 2010