Journal Home
Search for

Volume 43, Issue 3, Pages 242-250 (May 2010)


View previous. 17 of 25 View next.

QRS integral: an electrocardiographic indicator of mechanical interventricular asynchrony☆☆

Alexander SamolaCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Stefan Klotz, MDb, Jörg Stypmann, MDa, Hans-Jürgen Bruns, PhDa, Richard Houben, PhDc, Matthias Paul, MDa, Christian Vahlhaus, MDa

Received 16 September 2009 published online 27 January 2010.

Abstract 

Aim

The aim of this study was to investigate whether interventricular asynchrony (IVA) can be measured by electrocardiography.

Methods

Sixty-two patients (New York Heart Association heart failure functional class III: age, mean ± SD: 64 ± 9 years; ejection fraction, mean ± SD: 24% ± 8%; dilative cardiomyopathy/ischemic cardiomyopathy, n = 39/23) with left bundle branch block (QRS duration, mean ± SD: 165 ± 21 milliseconds) underwent a 120-channel body surface mapping. QRS integral was analyzed and compared with IVA (echo).

Results

Interventricular asynchrony was associated with significantly decreased QRS integrals 15 cm cranial and 6 cm lateral from V1 in patients with normal axis (n = 36): At a cutoff value of −26 milliseconds ⁎ mV, receiver operating characteristic analysis to predict IVA revealed a sensitivity of 89% and a specificity of 83% (area under curve, mean ± SEM: 0.9 ± 0.07; P < .001). In patients with left axis deviation (n = 26), IVA showed significantly decreased QRS integrals 10 cm caudal from V1: at a cutoff value of −89 milliseconds ⁎ mV, receiver operating characteristic analysis to predict IVA revealed a sensitivity of 83% and a specificity of 100% (area under curve, mean ± SEM: 0.9 ± 0.07; P < .002).

Conclusions

Interventricular asynchrony strongly correlates with QRS integral. Key lead positions, however, are axis dependent and outside standard leads.

a Department of Cardiology and Angiology, University Hospital of Muenster, Germany

b Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospital of Muenster, Germany

c Medtronic Bakken Research Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Universitätsklinikum Münster, Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik C, Albert-Schweitzer-Str. 33, D-48149 Münster, Germany.

 No author has a conflict of interest.

☆☆ This study was supported by Medtronic (AF2000084) and in part supported by the German Research Foundation (Va 156/2-1).

PII: S0022-0736(09)00625-6

doi:10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2009.12.006


View previous. 17 of 25 View next.