Journal of Electrocardiology
Volume 43, Issue 3 , Pages 242-250, May 2010

QRS integral: an electrocardiographic indicator of mechanical interventricular asynchrony☆☆

  • Alexander Samol

      Affiliations

    • Department of Cardiology and Angiology, University Hospital of Muenster, Germany
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Universitätsklinikum Münster, Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik C, Albert-Schweitzer-Str. 33, D-48149 Münster, Germany.
  • ,
  • Stefan Klotz, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospital of Muenster, Germany
  • ,
  • Jörg Stypmann, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Cardiology and Angiology, University Hospital of Muenster, Germany
  • ,
  • Hans-Jürgen Bruns, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Cardiology and Angiology, University Hospital of Muenster, Germany
  • ,
  • Richard Houben, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Medtronic Bakken Research Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Matthias Paul, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Cardiology and Angiology, University Hospital of Muenster, Germany
  • ,
  • Christian Vahlhaus, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Cardiology and Angiology, University Hospital of Muenster, Germany

Received 16 September 2009 published online 27 January 2010.

Abstract 

Aim

The aim of this study was to investigate whether interventricular asynchrony (IVA) can be measured by electrocardiography.

Methods

Sixty-two patients (New York Heart Association heart failure functional class III: age, mean ± SD: 64 ± 9 years; ejection fraction, mean ± SD: 24% ± 8%; dilative cardiomyopathy/ischemic cardiomyopathy, n = 39/23) with left bundle branch block (QRS duration, mean ± SD: 165 ± 21 milliseconds) underwent a 120-channel body surface mapping. QRS integral was analyzed and compared with IVA (echo).

Results

Interventricular asynchrony was associated with significantly decreased QRS integrals 15 cm cranial and 6 cm lateral from V1 in patients with normal axis (n = 36): At a cutoff value of −26 milliseconds ⁎ mV, receiver operating characteristic analysis to predict IVA revealed a sensitivity of 89% and a specificity of 83% (area under curve, mean ± SEM: 0.9 ± 0.07; P < .001). In patients with left axis deviation (n = 26), IVA showed significantly decreased QRS integrals 10 cm caudal from V1: at a cutoff value of −89 milliseconds ⁎ mV, receiver operating characteristic analysis to predict IVA revealed a sensitivity of 83% and a specificity of 100% (area under curve, mean ± SEM: 0.9 ± 0.07; P < .002).

Conclusions

Interventricular asynchrony strongly correlates with QRS integral. Key lead positions, however, are axis dependent and outside standard leads.

Keywords: Heart failure, Interventricular asynchrony, Cardiac resynchronization therapy, Body surface mapping, ECG

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 No author has a conflict of interest.

☆☆ This study was supported by Medtronic (AF2000084) and in part supported by the German Research Foundation (Va 156/2-1).

PII: S0022-0736(09)00625-6

doi:10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2009.12.006

Journal of Electrocardiology
Volume 43, Issue 3 , Pages 242-250, May 2010