Journal of Electrocardiology
Volume 43, Issue 4 , Pages 344-350, July 2010

Assessment of atrial electromechanical delay by tissue Doppler echocardiography in patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy

  • Selcuk Pala, MD

      Affiliations

    • Cardiology Division, Kartal Kosuyou Heart and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
  • ,
  • Kursat Tigen, MD

      Affiliations

    • Cardiology Division, Kartal Kosuyou Heart and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Cardiology Division, Kartal Kosuyou Heart and Research Hospital, Kartal Koşuyolu Kalp Egt. ve Arst. Hastanesi, Denizer Cad. Cevizli, Kartal, Istanbul, Türkiye.
  • ,
  • Tansu Karaahmet, MD

      Affiliations

    • Cardiology Division, Kartal Kosuyou Heart and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
  • ,
  • Cihan Dundar, MD

      Affiliations

    • Cardiology Division, Kartal Kosuyou Heart and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
  • ,
  • Alev Kilicgedik, MD

      Affiliations

    • Cardiology Division, Kartal Kosuyou Heart and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
  • ,
  • Ahmet Güler, MD

      Affiliations

    • Cardiology Division, Kartal Kosuyou Heart and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
  • ,
  • Cihan Cevik, MD

      Affiliations

    • Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, TX, USA
  • ,
  • Cevat Kirma, MD

      Affiliations

    • Cardiology Division, Kartal Kosuyou Heart and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
  • ,
  • Yelda Basaran, MD

      Affiliations

    • Cardiology Division, Marmara University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey

Received 8 September 2009 published online 25 December 2009.

Abstract 

Background

Atrial electromechanical delay (AEMD) calculated from tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) echocardiography can be an alternative to invasive electrophysiologic studies. We investigated whether the AEMD obtained from TDI is prolonged in patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM).

Methods

Fifty-five patients with nonischemic DCM (23 men/32 women; age, 43.9 ± 14.8 years) and 55 controls (20 men/35 women; age, 41.3 ± 13.4 years) were included in this study. Atrial electromechanical delay (the time interval from the onset of P wave on electrocardiogram to the beginning of late diastolic wave [Am wave] on TDI) was calculated from the lateral and septal mitral annulus, and lateral tricuspid annulus (PA lateral, PA septum, and PA tricuspid, respectively). P-wave dispersion was calculated from the 12-lead electrocardiogram.

Results

PA lateral and PA septum duration were significantly longer in patients with nonischemic DCM than the controls (78.4 ± 19.7 versus 53.8 ± 6.6 and 55.2 ± 16.3 versus 40.5 ± 6.2, P < .0001 for both; respectively). However, PA tricuspid duration was statistically similar between the 2 groups (36.4 ± 10.9 versus 37.2 ± 5.7, P ≥ .05). P-wave dispersion was significantly higher in nonischemic DCM patients than the controls (53.0 ± 14.4 versus 37.5 ± 5.5, P < .0001). PA lateral was correlated with the left atrial maximal volume (r = 0.64, P < .0001), P-wave dispersion (r = 0.65, P < .0001), and log B-type natriuretic peptide (NT proBNP) (r = 0.63, P < .0001). There was a statistically significant and negative correlation between the PA lateral and left ventricular ejection fraction (r = −0.63, P < .0001) and E-wave deceleration time (r = −0.34, P < .0001). Multivariate analysis revealed that left atrial maximal volume and log NT proBNP were the independent predictors of PA lateral (P < .0001 and P = .003, respectively).

Conclusion

The AEMD was significantly prolonged in patients with nonischemic DCM. Left atrial enlargement and log NT proBNP were the independent predictors of this prolongation.

Keywords: Atrial electromechanical delay, Dilated cardiomyopathy, P-wave dispersion

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 There is no conflict of interest to be declared in this work.

PII: S0022-0736(09)00599-8

doi:10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2009.11.004

Journal of Electrocardiology
Volume 43, Issue 4 , Pages 344-350, July 2010