Journal of Electrocardiology
Volume 43, Issue 1 , Pages 31-39 , January 2010

Reference values of electrocardiogram repolarization variables in a healthy population

  • Christian Haarmark, MD

      Affiliations

    • The Danish National Research Foundation Centre for Cardiac Arrhythmia (DARC), Copenhagen, Denmark
    • Laboratory of Experimental Cardiology, Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
  • ,
  • Claus Graff, MScEng

      Affiliations

    • Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
  • ,
  • Mads P. Andersen, MScEng

      Affiliations

    • Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
  • ,
  • Thomas Hardahl, MScEng

      Affiliations

    • Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
  • ,
  • Johannes J. Struijk, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
  • ,
  • Egon Toft, MD PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
    • Department of Cardiology S, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
  • ,
  • Joel Xue, PhD

      Affiliations

    • General Electric Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI
  • ,
  • Gordon I. Rowlandson, MScEng

      Affiliations

    • General Electric Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI
  • ,
  • Peter R. Hansen, MD PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Cardiology P, Gentofte University Hospital, Hellerup, Denmark
  • ,
  • Jørgen K. Kanters, MD

      Affiliations

    • The Danish National Research Foundation Centre for Cardiac Arrhythmia (DARC), Copenhagen, Denmark
    • Laboratory of Experimental Cardiology, Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
    • Department of Cardiology S, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
    • Department of Cardiology P, Gentofte University Hospital, Hellerup, Denmark
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Laboratory of Experimental Cardiology, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Panum, Building 6.6.40, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3, DK-2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark.

Received 7 January 2009

References 

  1. Yan GX, Antzelevitch C. Cellular basis for the normal T-wave and the electrocardiographic manifestations of the long-QT syndrome. Circulation. 1998;98:1928
  2. Al Khatib SM, LaPointe NMA, Kramer JM, Califf RM. What clinicians should know about the QT-interval. JAMA. 2003;289:2120
  3. Kanters JK, Fanoe S, Larsen LA, et al. T-wave morphology analysis distinguishes between KvLQT1 and HERG mutations in long QT syndrome. Heart Rhythm. 2004;1:285
  4. Lubinski A, Kornacewicz-Jach Z, Wnuk-Wojnar AM, et al. The terminal portion of the T-wave: a new electrocardiographic marker of risk of ventricular arrhythmias. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2000;23:1957
  5. Zabel M, Acar B, Klingenheben T, et al. Analysis of 12-lead T-wave morphology for risk stratification after myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2000;102:1252
  6. Zareba W, Moss AJ, Konecki J. TU wave area–derived measures of repolarization dispersion in the long QT syndrome. J Electrocardiol. 1998;30:191
  7. Merri M, Benhorin J, Alberti M, Locati E, Moss AJ. Electrocardiographic quantitation of ventricular repolarization. Circulation. 1989;80:1301
  8. Struijk JJ, Kanters JK, Andersen MP, et al. Classification of the long-QT syndrome based on discriminant analysis of T-wave morphology. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2006;543:V44
  9. Graff C, Andersen MP, Xue JQ, et al. Distinct ECG patterns in LQT2 identify drug-induced repolarization abnormalities. Drug Safety. 2009;32:599
  10. Van Huysduynen BH, Swenne CA, Draisma HHM, et al. Validation of ECG indices of ventricular repolarization heterogeneity: a computer simulation study. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2005;16:1097
  11. Watanabe N, Kobayashi Y, Tanno K, et al. Transmural dispersion of repolarization and ventricular tachyarrhythmias. J Electrocardiol. 2004;37:191
  12. Yamazaki T, Myers J, Froelicher VF. Prognostic importance of isolated T-wave abnormalities. Am J Cardiol. 2005;95:300
  13. Hnatkova K, Gang YI, Batchvarov VN, Malik M. Precision of QT-interval measurement by advanced electrocardiographic equipment. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2006;29:1277
  14. Prineas R, Crow R, Blackburn H. The Minnesota code manual of electrocardiographic findings: standards and procedures for measurements. Littleton, MA: John Wright-PSG, Inc; 1982;
  15. Luo S, Michler K, Johnston P, Macfarlane PWA. Comparison of commonly used QT correction formulae: the effect of heart rate on the QTc of normal ECGs. J Electrocardiol. 2004;37:81
  16. Rautaharju PM, Surawicz B, Gettes LS. AHA/ACCF/HRS recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram: part IV: the ST segment, T and U waves, and the QT-interval: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; the American College of Cardiology Foundation; and the Heart Rhythm Society: endorsed by the International Society for Computerized Electrocardiology. Circulation. 2009;119:e241
  17. Bidoggia HC, Maciel JP, Capalozza N, et al. Sex-dependent electrocardiographic pattern of cardiac repolarization. Am Heart J. 2000;140:430
  18. Andersen MP, Xue JQ, Graff C, et al. New descriptors of T-wave morphology are independent of heart rate. J Electrocardiol. 2008;41:557
  19. Kanters JK, Haarmark C, Vedel-Larsen E, et al. T-peak to T-end (TpTe) interval in long QT syndrome. J Electrocardiol. 2008;41:603
  20. Nakagawa M, Takahashi N, Watanabe M, et al. Gender differences in ventricular repolarization: terminal T-wave interval was shorter in women than in men. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2003;26:59
  21. Smetana P, Batchvarov V, Hnatkova K, John Camm A, Malik M. Sex differences in the rate dependence of the T-wave descending limb. Cardiovasc Res. 2003;58:549
  22. Rautaharju P, Rautaharju F. Investigative electrocardiography in epidemiological studies and clinical trials. 1st ed. London: Springer; 2007;
  23. Rautaharju PM, Prineas RJ, Kadish A, et al. Normal standards for QT and QT subintervals derived from a large ethnically diverse population of women aged 50 to 79 years (the Women's Health Initiative [WHI]). Am J Cardiol. 2006;97:730
  24. Gambill CL, Wilkins ML, Haisty , et al. T-wave amplitudes in normal populations: variation with ECG lead, sex, and age. J Electrocardiol. 1995;28:191
  25. Yang H, Elko P, Fromm BS, et al. Maximal ascending and descending slopes of the T-wave in men and women. J Electrocardiol. 1997;30:267
  26. Macfarlane PW, Vietch Lawrie TD. Comprehensive electrocardiology—theory and practice in health and disease. 1st ed.. Oxford, England: Pergamon Press; 1989;
  27. Pham TV, Rosen MR. Sex, hormones, and repolarization. Cardiovasc Res. 2002;53:740
  28. Savelieva I, Yap YG, Yi G, et al. Comparative reproducibility of QT, QT peak, and T peak-T end intervals and dispersion in normal subjects, patients with myocardial infarction, and patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1998;2376:21
  29. Mason JW, Ramseth DJ, Chanter DO, et al. Electrocardiographic reference ranges derived from 79,743 ambulatory subjects. J Electrocardiol. 2007;40:228
  30. Haarmark C, Hansen PR, Vedel-Larsen E, et al. The prognostic value of the Tpeak-Tend interval in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. J Electrocardiol. 2009;42:555

 Source of funding: The work was supported by The Danish National Research Foundation Centre for Cardiac Arrhythmias and The Danish Heart Foundation.

PII: S0022-0736(09)00373-2

doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2009.08.001

Journal of Electrocardiology
Volume 43, Issue 1 , Pages 31-39 , January 2010