Journal Home
Search for

Volume 43, Issue 1, Pages 31-39 (January 2010)


View previous. 8 of 23 View next.

Reference values of electrocardiogram repolarization variables in a healthy population

Christian Haarmark, MDab, Claus Graff, MScEngc, Mads P. Andersen, MScEngc, Thomas Hardahl, MScEngc, Johannes J. Struijk, PhDc, Egon Toft, MD PhDcd, Joel Xue, PhDe, Gordon I. Rowlandson, MScEnge, Peter R. Hansen, MD PhDf, Jørgen K. Kanters, MDabdfCorresponding Author Informationemail address

Received 7 January 2009 published online 09 September 2009.

Abstract 

Introduction

Reference values for T-wave morphology analysis and evaluation of the relationship with age, sex, and heart rate are lacking in the literature. In this study, we characterized T-wave morphology in a large sample of healthy individuals.

Method

A total of 1081 healthy subjects (83% men; range, 17-81 years) were included. T-wave morphology variables describing the duration, area, slopes, amplitude, and distribution were calculated using 10-second digital electrocardiogram recordings. Multivariate regression was used to test for dependence of T-wave variables with the subject age, sex, and heart rate.

Results

Lead V5 (men vs women) T-wave variables were as follows: amplitude, 444 versus 317 μV; area, 48.4 versus 33.2 ms ⁎ mV; Tpeak-Tend interval, 94 versus 92 milliseconds; maximal descending slope, −5.15 versus −3.69 μV/ms; skewness, −0.24 versus −0.22; and kurtosis, −0.36 versus −0.35. Tpeak-Tend interval, skewness, and kurtosis were independent of age, sex, and heart rate (r2 < 0.05), whereas Bazett-corrected QT-interval was more dependent (r2 = 0.40).

Conclusion

A selection of T-wave morphology variables is found to be clinically independent of age, sex, and heart rate, including Tpeak-Tend interval, skewness, and kurtosis.

a The Danish National Research Foundation Centre for Cardiac Arrhythmia (DARC), Copenhagen, Denmark

b Laboratory of Experimental Cardiology, Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark

c Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark

d Department of Cardiology S, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark

e General Electric Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI

f Department of Cardiology P, Gentofte University Hospital, Hellerup, Denmark

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Laboratory of Experimental Cardiology, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Panum, Building 6.6.40, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3, DK-2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark.

 Source of funding: The work was supported by The Danish National Research Foundation Centre for Cardiac Arrhythmias and The Danish Heart Foundation.

PII: S0022-0736(09)00373-2

doi:10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2009.08.001


View previous. 8 of 23 View next.