« Previous
Next »
Journal of Electrocardiology
Volume 42, Issue 6
, Pages
543-548
, November 2009
Atrial-selective sodium channel block as a novel strategy for the management of atrial fibrillation
-
Differences in ion channel currents of action potentials from normal atria and ventricles and remodeled atria. A and B, The normal action potential in atria differs from that of the ventricle with res
Differences in ion channel currents of action potentials from normal atria and ventricles and remodeled atria. A and B, The normal action potential in atria differs from that of the ventricle with respect to ion channel currents that contribute to RMP, phase 1, and phase 3 of the action potential. Resting membrane potential in atria is more depolarized than in the atrial due a smaller IK1. Phase 1 is more prominent in atria due to the presence of a prominent Ito and IKur. Both IKur and IK-ACh are exclusive to atria. Phase 3 of the action potential is much slower to repolarize in atria because of weaker repolarizing currents IKr, IKs, and IK1. C, Rapid activation of the atria during AF results in a decrease in ICa, IKur, and Ito but in an increase in IK1 and constitutively active IK-ACh. The abbreviation of action potential duration is due principally to the decrease in ICa and the increase in IK1 and constitutively active IK-ACh
-
Ranolazine produces a much greater rate-dependent inhibition of the maximal action potential upstroke velocity (Vmax) in atria than in ventricles. Top: Vmax and action potentials recordings obtained fRanolazine produces a much greater rate-dependent inhibition of the maximal action potential upstroke velocity (Vmax) in atria than in ventricles. Top: Vmax and action potentials recordings obtained from coronary-perfused canine right atrium (crista terminalis) before control (C) and after ranolazine (10 μmol/L). Bottom: Vmax and action potentials (AP) recordings obtained from coronary-perfused canine left ventricular wedge preparation (M cell) before (C) and after ranolazine (10 μmol/L). Ranolazine prolongs late repolarization in atria but not ventricles and acceleration of rate leads to elimination of the diastolic interval, resulting in a more positive takeoff potential in atrium, which contributes to atrial selectivity of the drug. The diastolic interval remains relatively long in ventricles.
☆ This study was supported by grant HL47678 from NHLBI (CA) and Masons of NYS and Florida.
PII: S0022-0736(09)00275-1
doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2009.07.007
© 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
Journal of Electrocardiology
Volume 42, Issue 6
, Pages
543-548
, November 2009
