Journal of Electrocardiology
Volume 42, Issue 6 , Pages 500-504 , November 2009

24-Hour QT variability in heart failure

  • Craig P. Dobson

      Affiliations

    • Children's National Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA
  • ,
  • Maria Teresa La Rovere

      Affiliations

    • Fondazione S. Maugeri, IRCCS, Instituto Scientifico di Montescano, Montescano (Pavia), Italy
  • ,
  • Cara Olsen

      Affiliations

    • Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA
  • ,
  • Marino Berardinangeli

      Affiliations

    • Ospedale Civile, Rho (Milano), Italy
  • ,
  • Marco Veniani

      Affiliations

    • Ospedale Civile S. Giuseppe, Albano Laziale (Roma), Italy
  • ,
  • Paolo Midi

      Affiliations

    • USL 4, Terni, Italy
  • ,
  • Luigi Tavazzi

      Affiliations

    • GVM Hospitals of Care and Research, Cotignola (Ravenna), Italy
  • ,
  • Mark Haigney

      Affiliations

    • Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, A3060, USUHS, 4301 Jones Bridge Road, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA.
  • ,
  • on behalf of the GISSI-HF Investigators

Received 11 April 2009

  • Image Result

    Comparison of mean QT variability for 24 hours in GISSI HF subjects. A, Mean ± SEM QTVI for 24 hours; all time points are significantly different by post hoc testing, P < .0001. B, Mean ± SEM QTVN for

    Comparison of mean QT variability for 24 hours in GISSI HF subjects. A, Mean ± SEM QTVI for 24 hours; all time points are significantly different by post hoc testing, P < .0001. B, Mean ± SEM QTVN for 24 hours; all time points are significantly different from 0 to 6 am by post hoc testing, P < .0001. C, Mean ± SEM in normalized HRv for 24 hours; there was significant diurnal variation (P < .001). After adjusting for multiple comparisons using Tukey procedure, no significant difference was found between the midnight to 6 am and the 6 am to noon time periods (P = .979), or between the noon to 6 pm and the 6 pm to midnight time periods (P = .683). All other differences were statistically significant (P < .001).

 Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article reflect the opinions of the authors only and not the official policy of the United States Army, Uniformed Services University, or the Department of Defense.

PII: S0022-0736(09)00266-0

doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2009.06.021

Journal of Electrocardiology
Volume 42, Issue 6 , Pages 500-504 , November 2009