Impaired left ventricular function is associated with increased recovery time dispersion in patients with previous myocardial infarction☆

Abstract

Left ventricular (LV) dysfunction after myocardial infarction is associated with higher risk of serious ventricular arrhythmias and sudden death. We suspected that heterogeneity in ventricular repolarization contributes to these arrhythmias. To quantify this heterogeneity, we measured the recovery time (the interval between QRS onset and the time of maximum dV/dt in the ST-T segment) using an 87-lead body surface mapping electrocardiogram and estimated recovery time dispersion (the difference between maximum recovery time and minimum recovery time) in each lead. Differences between 110 patients with previous myocardial infarction and 31 healthy controls were compared. Recovery time dispersion [medians (25th, 75th percentiles)] was greatest in patients with a dilated LV {169 ms (154, 201) vs. 155 ms (137, 172), P < .005}, impaired ejection fraction {173 ms (155, 202) vs. 152 ms (138, 165), P < .0005} and LV dyskinesis {175 ms (159, 201) vs. 155 ms (137, 161), P < .0005}. This study suggests that LV dysfunction associated with myocardial infarction leads to heterogeneous ventricular repolarization and may provide the electrical substrate for ventricular arrhythmias.

Keywords: Repolarization abnormalities, previous myocardial infarction, impaired left ventricular function, recovery time, ventricular arrhythmias

No full text is available. To read the body of this article, please view the PDF online.

Article Outline

• Abstract

• References

• Copyright

References

1. 1 Stevenson WG, Brugada P, Waldecker B, et al. Clinical, angiographic, and electrophysiologic findings in patients with aborted sudden death as compared with patients with sustained ventricular tachycardia after myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1985;71:1146. MEDLINE

2. 2 Stevenson WG, Stevenson LW, Middlekauff HR, et al. Sudden death prevention in patients with advanced ventricular dysfunction. Circulation. 1993;88:2953. MEDLINE

3. 3 Cassidy DM, Vassallo JA, Miller JM, et al. Endocardial catheter mapping in patients in sinus rhythm: relationship to underlying heart disease and ventricular arrhythmias. Circulation. 1986;73:645. MEDLINE

4. 4 Gomes JA, Winters SL, Martinson M, et al. The prognostic significance of quantitative signal-averaged variables relative to clinical variables, site of myocardial infarction, ejection fraction and ventricular premature beats: A prospective study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1989;13:377. Abstract | Full-Text PDF (997 KB) | CrossRef

5. 5 Merx W, Yoon MS, Han J. The role of local disparity in conduction and recovery time on ventricular vulnerability to fibrillation. Am Heart J. 1977;94:603. MEDLINE | CrossRef

6. 6 Kuo CS, Reddy CP, Munakata K, et al. Mechanism of ventricular arrhythmias caused by increased dispersion of repolarization. Eur Heart J. 1985;6:63.

7. 7 Olsson SB, Brorson L, Edvardsson N, et al. Estimation of ventricular repolarization in man by monophasic action potential recording technique. Eur Heart J. 1985;6:71.

8. 8 Higham PD, Furniss SS, Campbell RW. QT dispersion and components of the QT interval in ischaemia and infarction. Br Heart J. 1995;73:32. MEDLINE | CrossRef

9. 9 Moreno FL, Villanueva T, Karagounis LA, et al. Reduction in QT interval dispersion by successful thrombolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction. TEAM-2 Study Investigators. Circulation. 1994;90:94. MEDLINE

10. 10 Barr CS, Naas AA, Fenwick M, et al. Enalapril reduces QTc dispersion in mild congestive heart failure secondary to coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 1997;79:328. Abstract | Full Text | Full-Text PDF (250 KB) | CrossRef

11. 11 Haws CW, Lux RL. Correlation between in vivo transmembrane action potential durations and activation-recovery intervals from electrograms. Effects of interventions that alter repolarization time. Circulation. 1990;81:281. MEDLINE

12. 12 Shimizu W, Kamakura S, Ohe T, et al. Diagnostic value of recovery time measured by body surface mapping in patients with congenital long QT syndrome. Am J Cardiol. 1994;74:780. MEDLINE | CrossRef

13. 13 Shimizu W, Kamakura S, Kurita T, et al. Influence of epinephrine, propranolol, and atrial pacing on spatial distribution of recovery time measured by body surface mapping in congenital long QT syndrome. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1997;8:1102. MEDLINE | CrossRef

14. 14 Franz MR. Long-term recording of monophasic action potentials from human endocardium. Am J Cardiol. 1983;51:1629. MEDLINE | CrossRef

15. 15 Perkiömäki JS, Huikuri HV, Koistinen JM, et al. Heart rate variability and dispersion of QT interval in patients with vulnerability to ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation after previous myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;30:1331. Abstract | Full Text | Full-Text PDF (245 KB) | CrossRef

16. 16 Tamura A, Nagase K, Mikuriya Y, et al. Relation of QT dispersion to infarct size and left ventricular wall motion in anterior wall acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 1999;83:1423. Abstract | Full Text | Full-Text PDF (116 KB) | CrossRef

17. 17 Karagounis LA, Anderson JL, Moreno FL, et al. Multivariate associates of QT dispersion in patients with acute myocardial infarction: Primacy of patency status of the infarct-related artery. TEAM-3 Investigators. Third trial of Thrombolysis with Eminase in Acute Myocardial Infarction. Am Heart J. 1998;135:1027. Abstract | Full Text | Full-Text PDF (138 KB) | CrossRef

18. 18 Shimizu W. Concept of activation recovery interval and clinical usefulness of body surface recovery time and recovery time isochrone map. Nippon Rinsho. 1995;53:74. MEDLINE

19. 19 Luu M, Stevenson WG, Stevenson LW, et al. Diverse mechanisms of unexpected cardiac arrest in advanced heart failure. Circulation. 1989;80:1675. MEDLINE

20. 20 Packer M, Lee WH, Kessler PD, et al. Role of neurohormonal mechanisms in determining survival in patients with severe chronic heart failure. Circulation. 1987;75:IV80. MEDLINE

21. 21 Taggart P, Sutton P, John R, et al. Monophasic action potential recordings during acute changes in ventricular loading induced by the Valsalva manoeuvre. Br Heart J. 1992;67:221. MEDLINE | CrossRef

22. 22 Pak PH, Nuss HB, Tunin RS, et al. Repolarization abnormalities, arrhythmia and sudden death in canine tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;30:576. Abstract | Full Text | Full-Text PDF (391 KB) | CrossRef

23. 23 Li HG, Jones DL, Yee R, et al. Electrophysiologic substrate associated with pacing-induced heart failure in dogs: potential value of programmed stimulation in predicting sudden death. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992;19:444. Abstract | Full-Text PDF (372 KB) | CrossRef

24. 24 Ishida S, Nakagawa M, Fujino T, et al. Circadian variation of QT interval dispersion: Correlation with heart rate variability. J Electrocardiol. 1997;30:205. Abstract | Full-Text PDF (442 KB) | CrossRef

25. 25 Millar CK, Kralios FA, Lux RL. Correlation between refractory periods and activation-recovery intervals from electrograms: Effects of rate and adrenergic interventions. Circulation. 1985;72:1372. MEDLINE

Department of Internal Medicine, Cardiovascular Division, Hyogo College of Medicine, Nishinomiya, Japan

☆ Reprint requests: Hiroki Shimizu, MD, Department of Internal Medicine, Cardiovascular Division, Hyogo College of Medicine, 1-1, Mukogawa-cho, Nishinomiya, 663-8501, Japan; e-mail: hiroki@hyo-med.ac.jp.

PII: S0022-0736(02)30456-4

1 of 12