Combination of QT variability and signal-averaged electrocardiography in association with ventricular tachycardia in postinfarction patients☆

Abstract

The authors investigate incidence of ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation (VT/VF) in relationship with combination of noninvasive arrhythmia risk markers as left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), late potentials (LP), and QT variability index (QTVI) and compare the utility of their combination in association with sustained ventricular arrhythmias in patients after myocardial infarction (MI). Fifty-four patients with old MI, among them 27 with documented spontaneous sustained VT/VF entered the study. All of them underwent evaluation for arrhythmias and noninvasive risk stratificaton. Logistic regression analysis demonstrated that the highest association with ventricular tachyarrhythmia had combination of LP and increased QTVI (13.8, P<.0002), followed then by combination of LVEF and LP (12.2, P<.0005), LP alone (P<.001), QTVI (P<.002) and LVEF (P<.003) alone and age (P<.01). After stepwise regression analysis showed that the model including association of LP and QTVI, age and EF is the best one for delineating patients having the risk of ventricular tachyarrhythmia development. In conclusion, patients with combination of positive LP and increased QTVI after MI have high likelihood for development of serious sustained arrhythmia.

Keywords: Ventricular tachycardia, QT variability, late potentials, ejection fraction, myocardial infarction

No full text is available. To read the body of this article, please view the PDF online.

Article Outline

• Abstract

• References

• Copyright

References

1. 1 Kleiger RE, Miller JP, Bigger JT, Moss AJ, the Multicenter Post-Infarction Research Group . Decreased heart rate variability and its association with increased mortality after acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 1987;59:256. MEDLINE | CrossRef

2. 2 Farrell TG, Bashir Y, Cripps T, et al. Risk stratification for arrhythmic events in postinfarction patients based on heart rate variability, ambulatory electrocardiographic variables and the signal-averaged electrocardiogram. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1991;18:687. Abstract | Full-Text PDF (715 KB) | CrossRef

3. 3 Zuanetti G, Neilson JMM, Latini R, Santoro E, Maggioni AP, Ewing DJ, et al. Prognostic Significance of Heart Rate Variability in Post-Myocardial Infarction Patients in the Fibrinolytic Era. The GISSI-2 Results. Circulation. 1996;94:432. MEDLINE

4. 4 La Rovere MT, Bigger JT, Marcus FI, Mortara A, Schwartz PJ, for the ATRAMI (Autonomic Tone and Reflexes After Myocardial Infarction) Investigators . Baroreflex sensitivity and heart-rate variability in prediction of total cardiac mortality after myocardial infarction. Lancet. 1998;478:351. Abstract | Full Text | Full-Text PDF (94 KB)

5. 5 El-Sherif N, Denes P, Katz R, et al. , for the Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial/Signal-Averaged Electrocardiogram (CAST/SAECG) substudy investigators : Definition of the best prediction criteria of the time domain signal-averaged electrocardiogram for serious arrhythmic events in the postinfarction period. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995;25:908. Abstract | Full-Text PDF (763 KB) | CrossRef

6. 6 Kuchar DL, Thorburn CW, Sammel NL. Prediction of serious arrhythmic events after myocardial infarction: signal-averaged electrocardiogram, Holter monitoring and radionuclide ventriculography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1987;9:531. Abstract | Full-Text PDF (678 KB) | CrossRef

7. 7 Gomes JA, Winters SL, Stewart D, et al. A new noninvasive index to predict sustained ventricular tachycardia and sudden death in the first year after myocardial infarction: based on signal-averaged electrocardiogram, radionuclide ejection fraction and Holter monitoring. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1987;10:349. Abstract | Full-Text PDF (848 KB) | CrossRef

8. 8 Armoundas AA, Rosenbaum DS, Ruskin JN, et al. Prognostic significance of electrical alternans versus signal-averaged electrocardiography in predicting the outcome of electrophysiological testing and arrhythmia-free survival. Heart. 1998;80:251. MEDLINE

9. 9 Hohnloser SH, Klingenheben T, Li YG, et al. T wave alternans as a predictor of recurrent ventricular tachyarrhythmias in ICD recipients: Prospective comparison with conventional risk markers. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1998;9:1258. MEDLINE | CrossRef

10. 10 Lee KW, Okin PM, Kligfield P, et al. Precordial QT dispersion and inducible ventricular tachycardia. Am Heart J. 1997;134:1005. Abstract | Full Text | Full-Text PDF (1021 KB) | CrossRef

11. 11 Gomes JA, Cain ME, Buxton AE, et al. Prediction of long-term outcomes by signal-averaged electrocardiography in patients with unsustained ventricular tachycardia, coronary artery disease, and left ventricular dysfunction. Circulation. 2001;104:436. CrossRef

12. 12 Buxton AE, Hafley GE, Michael H, Lehmann ME, et al. , for the Multicenter Unsustained Tachycardia Trial (MUSTT) Investigators Prediction of sustained ventricular tachycardia inducible by programmed stimulation in patients with coronary artery disease. Utility of Clinical Variables. Circulation. 1999;99:1843.

13. 13 Ikeda T, Sakata T, Takami M, et al. Combined assessment of T-wave alternans and late potentials used to predict arrhythmic events after myocardial infarction. A prospective study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;35:722. Abstract | Full Text | Full-Text PDF (467 KB) | CrossRef

14. 14 Schmitt C, Barthel P, Ndrepepa C, et al. Value of programmed ventricular stimulation for prophylactic ınternal cardioverter defibrillator implantation in postinfarction patients preselected by noninvasive risk stratifiers. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;37:1901. Abstract | Full Text | Full-Text PDF (225 KB) | CrossRef

15. 15 Moss AJ, Zareba W, Hall WJ, et al. The Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial II Investigators Prophylactic implantation of a defibrillator in patients with myocardial infarction and reduced ejection fraction. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:877. CrossRef

16. 16 Moss AJ, Hall WJ, Cannom DS, et al. , For the MADIT trial investigators : Improved survival with an implanted defibrillator in patients with coronary disease at high risk for ventricular arrhythmia. N Engl J Med. 1996;335:1933. MEDLINE | CrossRef

17. 17 Domanski MJ, Sakseena S, Epstein AE, for the AVID Investigators . Relative effectiveness of the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator and antiarrhythmic drugs in patients with varying degrees of left ventricular dysfunction who have survived malignant ventricular arrhythmias. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999;34:1090. Abstract | Full Text | Full-Text PDF (220 KB) | CrossRef

18. 18 Berger R, Kasper E, Baughman KL, Marban E, et al. Beat-to-beat QT interval variability. Novel evidence for repolarization lability in dilated cardiomyopathy. Circulation. 1997;96:1557. MEDLINE

19. 19 Atiga WL, Fananapazir L, McAreavey D, et al. Temporal repolarization lability in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy caused by b-myosin heavy-chain gene mutations. Circulation. 2000;101:1237.

20. 20 Atiga WL, Calkins H, Lawrence JH, et al. Beat-to-beat repolarization lability identifies patients at risk for sudden cardiac death. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1998;9:899. MEDLINE | CrossRef

21. 21 Gaudron P, Kugler I, Hu K, et al. Time course of cardiac structural, functional and electrical changes in asymptomatic patients after myocardial ınfarction: their ınter-relation and prognostic ımpact. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;38:33. Abstract | Full Text | Full-Text PDF (383 KB) | CrossRef

22. 22 Gardner PI, Ursell PC, Fenoglio JJ, Wit AL. Electrophysiologic and anatomic basis for fractionated electrograms recorded from healed myocardial infarcts. Circulation. 1985;72:596. MEDLINE

23. 23 Adamson PB, Vanoli E. Early autonomic and repolarization abnormalities contribute to lethal arrhythmias in chronic ıschemic heart failure. characteristics of a novel heart failure model in dogs with postmyocardial ınfarction left ventricular dysfunction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;37:1741. Abstract | Full Text | Full-Text PDF (336 KB) | CrossRef

24. 24 Viswanathan PC, Shaw RM, Rudy Y. Effects of Ikr and Iks heterogeneity on action potential duration and its rate dependence: a simulation study. Circulation. 1999;99:2466.

25. 25 Cheitlin MD, Alpert JS, Armstrong WF, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for the clinical application of echocardiography: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Clinical Application of Echocardiography). Circulation. 1997;95:1686. MEDLINE

26. 26 Breithardt G, Cain ME, El-Sherif N, et al. Standards for analysis of ventricular late potentials using high-resolution or signal-averaged electrocardiography: A statement by a task force committee of the European Society of Cardiology, the American Heart Association and the American College of Cardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1991;17:999. Abstract | Full-Text PDF (519 KB) | CrossRef

27. 27 Borggrefe M, Fetsch T, Martinez-Rubio A, et al. Prediction of arrhythmia risk based on signal-averaged ECG in postinfarction patients. PACE 2566. 1997;20:2566; (Part II).

28. 28 Zimmermann A, Sentici A, Adamec R, et al. Long-term prognostic significance of ventricular late potentials after a first acute myocardial infarction. Am Heart J. 1997;134:1019. Abstract | Full Text | Full-Text PDF (987 KB) | CrossRef

29. 29 Zaniboni M, Pollard AE, Yang L, et al. Beat-to-beat repolarization variability in ventricular myocytes and its suppression by electrical coupling. Am J Physiol (Heart Circ Physiol). 2000;278:H677. MEDLINE

Osmangazi University, Medical Faculty, Cardiology Department, Eskisehir, Turkey

☆ Reprint requests: Gulmira Kudaiberdieva, MD, Beyazevler Mah. 26 Sokak, Irem Apt, Kat 1, No 2, Adana, Turkey; e-mail: gulmira_kudaiberdieva@hotmail.com.

PII: S0022-0736(02)30454-0

3 of 12