Journal of Electrocardiology
Volume 36, Issue 1 , Pages 67-71, January 2003

Safe right bundle branch block pattern during permanent right ventricular pacing☆

  • Yung-Nien Yang, MD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Armed Forces Sung-Shan Hospital
    • ,
  • Wei-Hsian Yin, MD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Cardiology
    • ,
  • Mason Shing Young, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Internal Medicine, Cheng-Hsin General Hospital, Institute of Clinical Medicine, National Yang-Ming University School of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C.

Article Outline

Abstract 

It is known that an electrocardiogram (ECG) after transvenous right ventricular (RV) pacing should yield left bundle branch block (LBBB) QRS patterns. When right bundle branch block (RBBB) pacing morphology appears in a patient with a permanent or temporary transvenous RV pacemaker, myocardial perforation or malposition of the pacing lead must be ruled out, even though the patient may be asymptomatic. We report a case of a 77-year-old man who underwent permanent transvenous VDD pacemaker implantation for symptomatic heart block. The postoperative ECG revealed a RBBB pacing configuration, but his chest X-ray and echocardiographic studies confirmed uncomplicated RV pacing. We review and discuss the literature concerning the differential diagnosis of such a safe RBBB ECG pattern.

Keywords:  Ventricular pacing, right bundle branch block, pacing lead

No full text is available. To read the body of this article, please view the PDF online.

 

Back to Article Outline

References 

  1. Ormond RS, Rubenfire M, Anbe DT, et al.  Radiographic demonstration of myocardial perforation by permanent endocardial pacemaker. Radiology. 1971;98:35
  2. Stillman MT, Richards AMD. Perforation of the interventricular septum by transvenous pacemaker catheter. Am J Cardiol. 1969;24:269
  3. Meyer JA, Millar K. Malplacement of pacemaker catheters in the coronary sinus. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1969;57:511
  4. Ghani M, Thakur RK, Boughner D, et al.  Malposition of transvenous pacing lead in the left ventricle. PACE. 1993;16:1800
  5. Mazzetti H, Dussaut A, Tentori C, et al.  Transarterial permanent pacing of the left ventricle. PACE. 1990;13:588
  6. Klein HO, Beker B, Sareli P, et al.  Unusual QRS morphology associated with transvenous pacemaker. Chest. 1985;87:517
  7. Coman JA, Trohman RG. Incidence and electrocardiographic localization of safe right bundle branch block configuration during permanent ventricular pacing. Am J Cardiol. 1995;76:781
  8. Friedberg HD. Evaluation of unusual QRS complexes produced by pacemaker stimuli-with special reference to the vectorcardiographic and echocardiographic findings. J Electrocardiol. 1980;13:409
  9. Lister JW, Klotz DH, Jomain SL, et al.  Effect of pacemaker site on cardiac output and ventricular activation in dogs with complete heart block. Am J Cardiol. 1964;14:494
  10. Mower MM, Aranaga CE, Tabatznik B. Unusual patterns of conduction produced by pacemaker stimuli. Am Heart J. 1967;74:24
  11. Barold SS, Narula OS, Javier RP, et al.  Significance of right bundle-branch block patterns during pervenous ventricular pacing. Br Heart J. 1969;31:285
  12. Bauman DJ, Lamb KC, Tsagaris TJ. Unusual QRS wave forms associated with permanent pacemakers. Chest. 1973;64:480

☆ Reprint requests: Wei-Hsian Yin, MD, Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Cheng-Hsin General Hospital, 45 Cheng-Hsin St, Pei-Tou, Taipei, Taiwan,R.O.C.; e-mail: yin.wh@msa.hinet.net.

PII: S0022-0736(02)30453-9

doi:10.1054/jelc.2003.50002

Journal of Electrocardiology
Volume 36, Issue 1 , Pages 67-71, January 2003

Article Tools