Journal Home
Search for

Volume 42, Issue 4, Pages 339-344 (July 2009)


View previous. 11 of 18 View next.

Methods of teaching and evaluating electrocardiogram interpretation skills among cardiology fellowship programs in the United States

Alex J. Auseon, DOaCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Stephen F. Schaal, MDa, Albert J. Kolibash Jr., MDa, Rollin Nagel, PhDb, Catherine R. Lucey, MDb, Richard P. Lewis, MDa

Received 1 December 2008 published online 09 March 2009.

Abstract 

Background

This study examines the methods used by cardiology training programs within the United States to teach electrocardiogram (ECG) interpretation and prepare fellows for the American Board of Internal Medicine board examination.

Methods

A link to an 18-question Web-based survey was electronically mailed to 198 fellowship directors in the United States.

Results

The response rate was 45%. Most participating programs were university hospitals or affiliates (77%) and of moderate size (at least 11 total fellows [72%]). Programs were coordinated by senior (68%) general (60%) cardiologists. Only 42% of the programs performed formal testing. The American Board of Internal Medicine answer sheet was used by most faculty (92%) when teaching ECG interpretation.

Conclusions

Teaching of ECG interpretation varies among US fellowship programs. Coordination of curricula is performed by senior faculty, likely reflecting a trend toward subspecialization and dilution of ECG expertise among younger faculty. Future endeavors should focus on curriculum standardization with regular competency assessment.

a Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University, Ohio, USA

b Office for Scholarship in Medical Education, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Ohio, USA

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. 473 W. 12th Ave, Suite 200, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.

PII: S0022-0736(09)00018-1

doi:10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2009.01.004


View previous. 11 of 18 View next.